Linguistics and English Language

Meaning and grammar seminar

Speaker: Wataru Uegaki (University of Edinburgh)

Title: Factivity alternation and the ‘missing’ veridical reading of interrogative complements

Abstract: In a number of languages, some clause-embedding predicates exhibit 'factivity alternation', i.e., they allow both factive and non-factive interpretation with respect to declarative complements, depending on the choice of the complementation strategy (Lee & Hong 2016, Jeong 2020 on Korean; Özyıldız 2017 on Turkish; Hanink & Bochnak 2017 on Washo; Bondarenko 2020 on Barguzin Buryat). It is furthermore observed in Turkish and Buryat that the same predicates that license factivity alternation nevertheless only allow a veridical interpretation of interrogative complements (Bondarenko 2019; Özyıldız 2019). That is, the predicates disallow a non-veridical interpretation wrt interrogative complements, even though we might expect them to exist from theoretical considerations (Spector & Egre 2015). In this talk, I will provide a concrete analysis of a sub-case of the same observation in Japanese. Although predicates such as “shiru” (learn/know), “setsumei-suru” (explain) and “odoroku” (surprise) exhibit factivity alternation, they only license veridical interpretations of interrogative complements. Following earlier literature (e.g., Saito 2012, Shimamura 2018; Tomioka 2020), I will argue that (what is traditionally described as) declarative complements in Japanese allow a parse as an adjunct while interrogative complements are true (nominal) arguments of embedding predicates. Together with the assumption that predicates place a presupposition only to its arguments (cf. Bondarenko 2020), we can derive the obligatory veridical interpretation with respect to interrogative complements. I will also discuss implications of the proposal for the cross-linguistic analysis of different types of embedding strategies, as well as for the analysis of the recurring observations in the literature that question-embedding correlates with veridicality (i.e., that question-embedding predicates are typically veridical; Egre 2008; the observation that, although communication predicates like “tell” readily allow non-veridical interpretation with respect to declarative complements, their interpretation with respect to interrogative complements are---at least typically---veridical (Karttunen 1977; Groenendijk & Stokhof 2015; Spector & Egre 2015, a.o.))

Contact

Seminars are organised by the meaning and grammar research group.

Meaning and grammar research group

If you'd like more information on dates and venues this semester, or if you'd like to present, please email Richard Wilson, or subscribe to our mailing list.

Richard Wilson

Mailing lists service

Nov 15 2022 -

Meaning and grammar seminar

2022-11-15: Factivity alternation and the ‘missing’ veridical reading of interrogative complements

Room 4.3, Lister Learning & Teaching Centre, 5 Roxburgh Place, Edinburgh, EH8 9SU