Edinburgh Imaging

Menu

12 Aug 19. Featured Paper

Method for measuring disease activity in the coronary arteries.

Link to AHA Journals

 

Authors

Alastair J. Moss; Mhairi K. Doris; Jack P.M. Andrews; Rong Bing; Marwa Daghem; Edwin J. R. van Beek; Laura Forsyth; Anoop S.V. Shah; Michelle C. Williams; Stephanie Sellers; Jonathon Leipsic; Marc R. Dweck; Richard A. Parker; David E. Newby; Philip D. Adamson

 

Abstract

Coronary 18F-fluoride positron emission tomography identifies ruptured and high-risk atherosclerotic plaque.

The optimal method to identify, to quantify, and to categorize increased coronary 18F-fluoride uptake and determine its reproducibility has yet to be established.

This study aimed to optimize the identification, quantification, categorization, and scan-rescan reproducibility of increased 18F-fluoride activity in coronary atherosclerotic plaque.

 

Methods

In a prospective observational study, patients with multi-vessel coronary artery disease underwent serial 18F-fluoride positron emission tomography.

Coronary 18F-fluoride activity was visually assessed, quantified, and categorized with reference to maximal tissue to background ratios.

Levels of agreement for both visual and quantitative methods were determined between scans and observers.

 

Results

Thirty patients (90% male, 20 patients with stable coronary artery disease, and 10 with recent type 1 myocardial infarction) underwent paired serial positron emission tomography-coronary computed tomography angiography imaging within an interval of 12±5 days.

A mean of 3.7±1.8 18F-fluoride positive plaques per patient was identified after recent acute coronary syndrome, compared with 2.4±2.3 positive plaques per patient in stable coronary artery disease.

The bias in agreement in maximum tissue to background ratio measurements in visually positive plaques was low between observers (mean difference, −0.01; 95% limits of agreement, −0.32 to 0.30) or between scans (mean difference, 0.06; 95% limits of agreement, −0.49 to 0.61).

Good agreement in the categorization of focal 18F-fluoride uptake was achieved using visual assessment alone (κ=0.66) and further improved at higher maximum tissue to background ratio values.

 

Conclusions

Coronary 18F-fluoride activity is a precise and reproducible metric in the coronary vasculature.

The analytical performance of 18F-fluoride is sufficient to assess the prognostic utility of this radiotracer as a noninvasive imaging biomarker of plaque vulnerability.

 

Keywords