School of Literatures, Languages and CulturesSchool of Literatures, Languages and Cultures

Preparing external funding applications

The LLC offers a helpful set of guidelines on meeting deadlines, completing cost request forms, and identifying commitments for research applications. More detailed information is available in the LLC Research Handbook. Please also see the University of Edinburgh's Policy on Applying for External Funding.

Finding Funding

Research Professional is a useful tool which allows you to search funding schemes by a variety of criteria including keywords and/or closing dates. You must register to use the service.

Alternatively, ERI can assist with finding the most suitable sources of funding for your project. Contact Catherine Burns (tel. 514025 Email: c.burns@ed.ac.uk).

The Application Process

  1. Ensure that you are fully registered on the system as early as possible.
  2. When creating your application, please grant access/edit rights to both Eve Equi and your named ERI contact
  3. Ensure that any collaborators or reviewers involved in the project are fully registered on the system

Internal Peer Review

LLC has introduced a Peer Review System for grant applications and colleagues are strongly encouraged to make use of the system to improve applications to funding bodies.

Colleagues are expected to submit for peer review, all large grant applications - including all FEC projects; applications to Research Councils and those which will involve recruitment of research staff. At this stage it is not anticipated that smaller applications (e.g. travel grants and other small awards of £3000 unless these include the provision of a Research Assistant and/or other staff) need go through this process but the panel will be willing to look over any applications which you feel would benefit from the review process.

A School review panel has been appointed as below.

It is expected that applicants will first discuss their proposal with their Subject Area Research Adviser, who as the most 'local' person, i.e. in the applicant's field, would be aware of the discourse in the field and therefore the significance of the proposed project. It would be hoped they could offer comments on the proposal from that vantage point.

Once a final draft of the proposal is available, this should be passed to Eve Equi, who will contact the Review Panel members for input. At this level, the panel would be looking for what might be missing on a more generic basis, with less interest in the details of the proposed advance(s) to be made in the applicant's specific field. For example, there might be special attention paid to such 'boxes' as KE/'Impact'.

The applications may also be checked by ERI, and they might look at the latter but also check facts and figures of budgets, etc., as submitted.

Please note that a minimum of three weeks prior to the official deadline is required to turn this process around and as always, the earlier a proposal is received, the more assistance can be offered. Within a minimum of 7 days of receipt, a nominated panel member might meet with the applicant and/or offer email comments. There would be some time for revision and then the application could go to the HOS for authorisation by way of the IRG form.

Members of the LLC School Peer Review Panel (2012/13)

Note - applications to the Carnegie Trust

Carnegie Trust application forms do not require institutional authorisation before submission. It is nevertheless important that you continue to keep the School Office and ERI informed of such applications and declare any awards granted by this funding body. Please note that Carnegie offer the option of paying by personal cheque or payment through the University. Whilst the School will not enforce either method, grant recipients should be aware that only money paid to the University will count towards RAE.

Useful Links to External Funding Sources


Accessibility menu